Metatron

USCA, 2nd Circuit, 10-3022

Home
Why doesn't the City of San Jose fly the national flag according to the law?
Letter to Rush Limbaugh on the 15th Anniversary of 9/11
CONTACT
Hierosolyma: An Eight Part Peace Proposal for Greater Jerusalem
Beth El Is the Correct, Prophesied Location for the Real Israel's Next Temple
Constitution of the USA Offers Model Legal Mechanism for Conflict Resolution Among Nations
An Eight Part Peace Proposal for Greater Jerusalem Copyrights
SUBMISSION TO THE LAST SAVIOUR FESTIVAL BEING HELD IN TEHRAN, IRAN
ERSATZ ISRAEL: On those who say they are Jews, but are not.
KHAZARS from the Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th edition
TALMUD AWARENESS
The Talmudic Law of the Moser
Julius Rosenberg & the Talmudic Law of the Moser (Informer)
FAX BROADCASTS 2009
Fax Broadcasts 2005 & Before
Fax Broadcasts 2006
Fax Broadcasts 2007
Fax Broadcasts 2008
Letter to Chief Justice Rehnquist on George H. W. Bush & the JFK Assassination, 31 January 2005
Primary Documentary Evidence Showing Bush in Dallas & helping Jack Ruby spin Oswald's public Persona
USS Liberty Survivor fights for Truth, Justice & End of Cover-up
USS Liberty Incident: "The Missing Piece of the Middle East Peace Puzzle"
USS Liberty Documentary
US Army Intelligence Officer reveals Suppression of Analysts' Findings on USS Liberty Incident
FLASHBACK: Peled statement that 1967 Six Day War was in effect Dayan's "private venture"!
Arabic Numerals
Complaint of Judicial Misconduct against U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge A. Jay Cristol
Petition for Review of Chief Judge's Dismissal of Complaint
Letter of advice to the clerk of the court:
Letter of request to clerk of the court for permission to donate case file
Reply to court's request for inventory of documents to be donated.
Follow up to edit court's summary of inventory of documents to be donated.
A 9/11 Timeline within a 9/11 Timeline
Submission to the House of Lords Select Committee on Communications
The Praxis of Evil's Other Form of Telecommunications Hacking
The extraordinarily strange Odyssey of Professor Peter Bowal
Eyewitness Account of Judicial Conference on morning of 11 September 2001
9/11: Another Look
A Dissenting Critique of the 9/11 Commission Report
The Mastermind Behind 9/11?
Complaint to FCC on CNN's Bias Against "9/11 Truthers"
8 June 2012 Letter to District Attorney in San Jose, California
Open Letters on 9/11 to Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
Certified Letter to US Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey
Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
Highly Recommended Documentary Films on 9/11
Alex Jones's Interview with Colonel Donn de Grand Pre
Barbarians Inside the Gates
Schlock & Awe on Top of Shock & Awe: NIST Report on WTC 7
President Bush twice said he saw the first jet hit the north tower World Trade Center 1
9/11 Dutch Treat?
Was 9/11 an Inside Job?
Citizen Investigation Team
911 Index
ARTICLE RETRACTED: "Dulles Airport" Shadow casts Doubt on US Government's 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Letter to Chief Judge William B. Traxler, Jr., U. S. Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit, Richmond, VA
ARTICLE RETRACTED: "Dulles Airport" Shadow disproves US Government's 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Complaint against US Department of Justice et al. for 9/11 Fraud UPDATED 24 MAY 2010
USCA, 2nd Circuit, 10-3022
St. John v US DoJ et al. Plaintiff-Appellant Brief
Petition for Rehearing En Banc
St. John v. Attorney General of the USA
Double Crossing Liberty
Lebanon's Cedar of Truth
US President Barack Obama's True Citizenship Status and Eligibility to be President Still Unresolved
Letters to the Ambassadors of Kenya & Indonesia on Barack Obama's Qualifications to be US President
USAF EC-135N & EGYPTAIR Flight 990: Precursors of Remote Controlled Flights of 9/11?
USAF EC-135N ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT
In Memoriam: Yitzhak Rabin, Peacemaker
Eidelberg Column in The Jewish Press argues for the Overthrow of the Rabin Government
Incitement for Assassination of President Asad is in Violation of the Law!
Letter on Newt Gingrich's Law of the Jungle
TWA Flight 800 Ten Years On
Photo of Cruise Missile that shot down TWA Flight 800
Cybernetic Telecommunications Piracy, The Boeing Company, & the Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370
Letter to Putin
Letters to Dutch Safety Board on the Shoot-down of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 over Ukraine
Virginia Tech Massacre: Any Lessons Learned?
Mughniyah Assassination coincides with Brzezinski/Rand Corporation Visit with Asad in Damascus!
Hear, oh Muslims! Hear!
In Memoriam: Helen Thomas, an honest, fair, accurate and courageous journalist
Alex Odeh Assassination File
Alex Odeh Assassination File: The Cartoon
New Olympic Event: Georgian Tie Eating
Hollywood Black Bag Job on the Iranians
FLASHBACK! Letter to Warren Christopher on NY Times Golan maps & Golan wine, dated December 29,1992
Editors of The Jewish Press compared President of the USA with Pharaoh back in 1998!
Stephen M. St. John for President of USA 2012
Governors Island in New York Harbor: Site of UN Military Staff Committee Headquarters?
Corporate Advertising on Legal Tender. Mind over Matter. Mind over Money. Mind over Deficit!
Magi Blowout Sale! Xmas Jingle, Middle East Peace & Security for Ersatz Israel!
Historic Schlesinger Letter points to Angleton/Eliot Same Man Theory!
Letter from Arthur Schlesinger Jr.
Letter to Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.
E-mail to BBC's Rowena Thursby concerning Dr. David Kelly, Princess Diana & CIA's Angleton/Eliot
Broadsheet protesting "Shock & Awe" Attack on Iraq
March 2001 Fax on Angleton/Eliot Same Man Theory
BLOODY BUSH CABAL BROUGHT US DALLAS 1963; WATERGATE 1972; BEIRUT 1982; BAGHDAD 1991 & 2003
2 February 1989 Reply from Princess Diana's Lady-in-Waiting Anne Beckwith-Smith
Letter to Mary Jo White on Jonathan Pollard & Marc Rich
Correspondence from the British Royal Family and British Government regarding my peace proposal.
British Bombers dressed as Arabs and caught in the Act!
Judith Miller on Joseph M. Demarest, Jr.
Will? Is that you, Will?
Red Heifer Sighted?
Jesus: Don't be called "Rabbi"! Call no man "Father" on this earth!
Is Harry Potter hawking the British Coronation Throne?
Bowl of Stupid
Resumes
Letter of Recommendation from Dr. Frank Przetacznik
1993 Letter from Government of Lebanon
CONTACT
Why doesn't the city of San Jose fly our national flag according to the law?
Why doesn't the City of San Jose fly our national flag according to the law?

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, 10-3022, arising from Civil Judgment and Order of Dismissal by Chief Judge Loretta A. Preska, US District Court for the Southern District of New York, 10 CIV 3908.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

2ND CIRCUIT

-----------------------------------------------------------------------X

                                                                                          :                       10-3022

STEPHEN M. ST. JOHN, Pro Se,                                :

                                                                                          :

            Plaintiff-Appellant                                                :         MEMORANDUM OF LAW

                                                                                          :         IN SUPPORT OF

                                                                                          :         MOTION TO PROCEED

                                                                                          :         IN FORMA PAUPERIS

            -against-                                                               :

                                                                                          :

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE;       :

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES,  :

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.;                                                   :

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, SDNY,                         :

PREETINDER BHARARA;                                             :

ET ALII, JOHN AND JANE DOES ACTING AS            :

PERPETRATORS, ACCOMPLICES, AND                  :

ACCESSORIES TO THE ACTS DESCRIBED IN        :

THIS COMPLAINT,                                                            :

                                                                                             :

            Defendants-Appellees                                          :

--------------------------------------------------------------------------X

 

 

1)         Pursuant to Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, I the Plaintiff-Appellant Stephen M. St. John respectfully submit to this Court a Memorandum of Law which is my statement explaining the merits of the appeal.

2)         I the Plaintiff-Appellant ask this Court to grant to me the privilege to proceed in forma pauperis because my need to do so is real, as demonstrated in the Financial Affidavit,  and because the issues to be presented in the brief are compelling and in the interests of both justice and our national security.

3)         My impecunious state is accurately reflected in my Financial Affidavit filed with this Court.  I add I have been living in homeless shelters since 5 April 2010 and remain without income and employment despite my best efforts to remedy the situation.

4)         The legal issue boils down to Chief Judge Loretta A. Preska’s sua sponte finding (10-cv-3908) that I did not demonstrate actual damages resulting from the Department of Justice’s fraud that I allege and therefore I do not have proper standing to sue.  In my brief I will argue that highly unusual circumstances obtain in this case, and that the very notion of actual damage is therefore inadequate for the proper administration of justice.

5)         The wise advice seen on New York City subway posters to heighten security awareness - “If you see something, say something” - goes to the heart of the matter.  Herein is the essence of what promises to be a landmark case of a solitary citizen standing at the gates of justice and shaking the nations of the earth from very strong delusion about 9/11.  But what kind of jurisprudence denies a watchman’s approach, let alone his warning?  In a very real sense all citizens who see something and say something have standing and a corresponding natural right to a responsive government.  Amendments IX and X of the Constitution of the United States guarantee that no law or statute or decision can deny the Plaintiff-Appellant’s right to a responsive government, let alone reasonable relief that leads in this case to exposure of treasonous, warmongering fraud and rewards his vigilance and perseverance against all odds.

6)         Abraham Lincoln once said, “Let us have faith that right makes might.”  Where law intersects with humanity, surely the law’s natural rigidity can give way in circumstances never before encountered or even imagined by those who write or interpret it.  A just and proper resolution of this very extraordinary case should therefore not be contingent on actual damages such as loss of a spouse or other family member or property damage and a dollar amount attached thereto, especially when such a legal requirement prevents discussion of far graver matters that have hitherto been unexplored.  A unique and original discovery that explodes the 9/11 Myth should not be relegated to the dust bin of history and the discoverer in effect exiled to Siberia.  Rather, this Court will serve all of mankind quite well by initiating rational, honest and open discussion about a very troubling aspect of the official account of 9/11.  As Jesus said, “And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

7)         The issues to be presented in my brief stem from my discovery that the purported 9/11 “Dulles Airport” video surveillance tape – used to promote the publisher’s release of the false and misleading 9/11 Commission Report in 2004 and to convict Zacharias Moussaoui in 2006 – is a total fraud.  My July 2009 analysis of the video, which I downloaded from the website of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, clearly demonstrates that passersby in the far background of the video cast shadows from the sun which do not accord with reality or the Department of Justice’s scenario. 

8)        Clearly, certain folk in our intelligence and law enforcement communities have something to hide.  The sun and its shadows are unimpeachable witnesses, and basic geometry and astronomy give the proof with the aid of Google Earth software.  The evildoers’ video could not possibly have been made at Washington Dulles International Airport, but was made elsewhere, at a place and time as yet unknown, and then it was falsely presented as a Dulles video first to a believing public and then to a believing jury. A gambler’s illusion has eclipsed our national sovereignty; however, science uncovered the deception, which this Court must uphold.  A single page showing three key photos with a caption giving a concise statement of my finding concludes this memorandum.

9)         My repeated efforts to persuade public officials to recognize and deal with the bogus 9/11 “Dulles Airport” video have only met with what still seems to me to be a conspiracy of silence and shunning.  I have often wondered how you dare to analyze that and still keep your job at the FBI or CIA.  Now I am hopefully at the threshold of compelling a legal discovery process and achieving closure not just for me but for countless other people around the world who have been adversely affected by the events of 9/11 and who deserve to know the whole truth and nothing but the truth about what really happened.  Isn’t the main duty of judges to prevent force and fraud?

10)      The fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud which I allege was perpetrated from within the US Department of Justice give rise to the sensitive issue of perpetuating the very same fraud in the Southern District of New York in the event of the contemplated trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammad.  Therefore, I respectfully submit that it behooves this Court to adjudicate this matter forthwith.  It may well be that Khalid Sheikh Mohammad was as deluded as the rest of mankind concerning 9/11, in which case torture is a minor consideration with respect to state of mind.  The Defendants-Appellees need to choose:  do they still go forward with the fraud, or do they take proper measures to deal with the fraud and all its implications and consequences?  Establishment of judicial evidence with respect to their bogus “Dulles Airport” video surveillance tape will force them to choose one way or the other.  It is simply preposterous to hold that the Plaintiff-Appellant’s failure to demonstrate actual damages is a legal basis to avoid an adversarial process that conduces toward discovery of an important truth about 9/11.

            11)      Given the colossal intelligence failures leading to 9/11, and the ominously unfathomable intelligence apparatus that mushroomed out of control in the wake of the attacks on our nation, as reported in July 2010 by the Washington Post, this Court will do well to consider the likelihood that confusion is the intended result of overly secretive and compartmentalized but virtually disconnected segments of our intelligence and law enforcement communities.  Consider the following points in this most extraordinary case:

            12)  We have never seen any credible 9/11 video surveillance evidence of any of the passengers – let alone hijackers – at any of the three “Category X” high security airports from which the flights of 9/11 are said to have originated.  This fact alone – and this is just the tip of the iceberg – should have given us very good reason not to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, and it should now be the determining factor in our decision to leave these nations and start paying them restitution without any strings attached.

            13)  Just weeks after 9/11, Afghanistan’s Taliban government made a good faith proposal to deliver to us Osama Bin Laden on condition that we show evidence of his culpability.  The bogus 9/11 “Dulles Airport” video clearly shows why the US Government lacked the good faith required to reciprocate the Taliban’s reasonable offer.

            14)  Our government’s fraudulent use of the bogus 9/11 “Dulles Airport” video indicates foreknowledge and preparation for 9/11.

            15)  Foreknowledge and preparation for 9/11 are elements of the supreme international war crime which is, according to the Nuremberg Principles, to initiate a war of aggression.  Such aggressive war violates the letter and spirit of Article 2.4 of the Charter of the United Nations as well as our constitutionally mandated treaty obligations.

            16)  Foreknowledge and preparation for 9/11 also mean treason here at home. 

            17)  Until we act to remove the strong delusion about 9/11 with an honest investigation, treason will be double crossing liberty here and abroad.

            18)  Let’s pass the torch of freedom, not the cup of treason!  Let the Court establish judicial evidence with respect to the bogus “Dulles Airport” video, a major component of the 9/11 myth that was the catalyst for unjustified invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq.  Let the Court order a new investigation not just of 9/11, but of the cover-up and the shock and awe doctrine and its historical origin.

            19)  Let the Court show the difference between a ruse of war against an enemy and a ruse to fool people into waging war.  The latter is what happened on 9/11.  A high tech false flag military intelligence operation created a pretext to put American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol in fulfillment of objectives set by certain interest groups.

            20)  In his 29 January 2002 State of the Union speech President Bush observed:  “Those of us who have lived through these challenging times have been changed by them.  We’ve come to know truths that we will never question:  Evil is real, and it must be opposed.”  Indeed!  Surely the chain of custody of evidence for the fraudulent “Dulles Airport” video tape will lead us directly to the Praxis of Evil in our midst which actually pulled off 9/11 and framed certain “likely suspect” Arabs for these heinous crimes.

DATED:         12 August 2010

SIGNED:        Stephen M. St. John                      

Stephen M. St. John

XXXXX XXXXXX

Newark, CA   94560

Tel:  XXX XXX XXXX

Fax: XXX XXX XXXX

Email:  stephen@show-the-house.com

                                                                                                                                              

 

The photo above is a still taken from a video surveillance tape that was presented as evidence by the US Department of Justice at the trial of Zacharias Moussaoui in 2006.  The US Government falsely said the video shows five Arabs arriving at Washington Dulles International Airport on the morning of 11 September 2001 shortly before they boarded American Airlines Flight 77 which they hijacked and crashed.  But as Google Earth’s satellite imagery shows right below, the parallel main runways at Dulles go north/south at 10 and 190 degree headings and ground passengers come and go at the north face of the Main Terminal which is between the runways and directly adjacent to the traffic oval.  How, then, can one explain the sun’s shadow (a close-up appears at bottom of page) cast by a passerby in the far background of the film?  The shadow points toward the north face of the Main Terminal!  This is impossible when the sun rises in the east and casts shadows westward as it did on the morning of 9/11.  Therefore, the video is bogus in that it could not possibly have been made at Dulles, but was filmed elsewhere and then falsely presented to a jury as a Dulles video.  See www.show-the-house.com/id92.html.

 

Dulles Airport from 13045 feet

 

 

UPDATE 10 June 2012:  Here is progress to report!  My 5 August 2010 application to file court documents in this case electronically finally elicited a response (below) on 7 June 2012.  The wheels of justice turn slowly.  Maybe in due time I will have an explanation as to why the judges did not sign their judgment and order issued by the Clerk of the Court.

Message List Message List  Delete DeletePrevious  Next Forward Forward   Forward as Attachment   Reply Reply   Reply All Reply All   
 
Appellate CM/ECF Registration Status
From: pscmsg@psc.uscourts.gov
Date: Thu, June 7, 2012 10:33 am
To: stephen@show-the-house.com
Priority: Normal
Options: View Full Header |  View Printable Version  | Download this as a file | Add to Address Book  | View Message details
 

This
                                    email is notification that your appellate court electronic filing registration
has been processed. If the ECF Filing Status is 'Active,' you may begin filing
electronically in the court listed below.

If you have any questions, contact the PACER Service Center at (800) 676-6856
between 8 AM and 6 PM Central Time. Please do not reply to this email, the mailbox
is not monitored.

Username: mustashar
Circuit: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Date/Time Submitted: 2010-08-05 18:22:07
Transaction ID: 6377
Request: New Registration
Transaction Status: Rejected
ECF Filing Status:
Comment: A parrty cannot register for electronic case filing. If
you wish to view case dockets, you may register as a public interested person.


 
Delete & Prev |  Delete & Next

 

                                     

Thank you for visiting my website.  Please come back soon! 
 
* * * * * * *
©  Stephen M. St. John 2007, 2017
 
All original articles written by Stephen M. St. John and published on this website and its forerunner mysite.verizon.net/vze4wbps are fully protected by copyright law.  All rights are reserved.  However, non-commercial dissemination of these articles is allowed and encouraged so long as there is no change to the text or its meaning and proper attribution is given to the author, Stephen M. St. John.  Requests for commercial republication should be directed to the author through the contact information given below.  The author is not responsible for any changes made to the contents of this website without his awareness and consent, and will as soon as possible restore the true content if and when such unauthorized changes are discovered.
 
Current (2017) contact information:
 
stephen@show-the-house.com
stephen.m.st.john@gmail.com
Please direct email to both email addresses
.
 
Cellphone:  408 934 6549
 
For regular mail via USPS, please send to
:
 
Stephen M. St. John
Post Office Box 720274
San José, CA   95172
United States of America
 
For FedEx and UPS shipments, please send to:
 
Stephen M. St. John
Colonnade # 720274
200 South 3rd Street
San José, CA 95112
USA
 

 
(The San José contact information shown above supercedes all previous contact information that may appear in this website including the mailing addresses Post Office Box 449, Rockefeller Center, New York, NY 10185; Post Office Box 1223, Newark, CA 94560; the email address metatron.metatron@verizon.net; and telephone numbers 212 534 5024 and 917 519 2905.  All postal forwarding orders have long been expired.)

* * * * * * *