Petition for Rehearing En Banc

REAL JOURNALISM: Something BIG is missing from John Durham's Russiagate Probe
Something BIG is missing from John Durham's Russiagate Report
11 September 2021: A Day of Remembrance & Resolve
A Call to put Trump before an International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal
Slam the BREXIT Door shut on the Warmongers with an International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal
Lifting the Burdens of Falsehood & Deceit: Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorneys General of the USA
Trump-Mueller-Giuliani 9/11 Conflicts of Interest
Mueller-Trump Conflict of Interest: An Opening for a 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal
Trump-Mueller Conflict of Interest
Preventing WWIII with a 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal
Hierosolyma: An Eight Part Peace Proposal for Greater Jerusalem
Beth El Is the Correct, Prophesied Location for the Real Israel's Next Temple
Constitution of the USA Offers Model Legal Mechanism for Conflict Resolution Among Nations
An Eight Part Peace Proposal for Greater Jerusalem Copyrights
ERSATZ ISRAEL: On those who say they are Jews, but are not.
KHAZARS from the Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th edition
The Talmudic Law of the Moser
Julius Rosenberg & the Talmudic Law of the Moser (Informer)
Fax Broadcasts 2005 & Before
Fax Broadcasts 2006
Fax Broadcasts 2007
Fax Broadcasts 2008
Letter to Chief Justice Rehnquist on George H. W. Bush & the JFK Assassination, 31 January 2005
Primary Documentary Evidence Showing Bush in Dallas & helping Jack Ruby spin Oswald's public Persona
USS Liberty Survivor fights for Truth, Justice & End of Cover-up
USS Liberty Incident: "The Missing Piece of the Middle East Peace Puzzle"
USS Liberty Documentary
US Army Intelligence Officer reveals Suppression of Analysts' Findings on USS Liberty Incident
FLASHBACK: Peled statement that 1967 Six Day War was in effect Dayan's "private venture"!
Arabic Numerals
Complaint of Judicial Misconduct against U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge A. Jay Cristol
Petition for Review of Chief Judge's Dismissal of Complaint
Letter of advice to the clerk of the court:
Letter of request to clerk of the court for permission to donate case file
Reply to court's request for inventory of documents to be donated.
Follow up to edit court's summary of inventory of documents to be donated.
Letter to Rush Limbaugh on the 15th Anniversary of 9/11
A 9/11 Timeline within a 9/11 Timeline
Submission to the House of Lords Select Committee on Communications
The Praxis of Evil's Other Form of Telecommunications Hacking
The extraordinarily strange Odyssey of Professor Peter Bowal
Eyewitness Account of Judicial Conference on morning of 11 September 2001
9/11: Another Look
A Dissenting Critique of the 9/11 Commission Report
The Mastermind Behind 9/11?
Complaint to FCC on CNN's Bias Against "9/11 Truthers"
8 June 2012 Letter to District Attorney in San Jose, California
Open Letters on 9/11 to Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
Certified Letter to US Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey
Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
Highly Recommended Documentary Films on 9/11
Alex Jones's Interview with Colonel Donn de Grand Pre
Barbarians Inside the Gates
Schlock & Awe on Top of Shock & Awe: NIST Report on WTC 7
President Bush twice said he saw the first jet hit the north tower World Trade Center 1
9/11 Dutch Treat?
Was 9/11 an Inside Job?
Citizen Investigation Team
911 Index
ARTICLE RETRACTED: "Dulles Airport" Shadow casts Doubt on US Government's 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Letter to Chief Judge William B. Traxler, Jr., U. S. Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit, Richmond, VA
ARTICLE RETRACTED: "Dulles Airport" Shadow disproves US Government's 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Complaint against US Department of Justice et al. for 9/11 Fraud UPDATED 24 MAY 2010
USCA, 2nd Circuit, 10-3022
St. John v US DoJ et al. Plaintiff-Appellant Brief
Petition for Rehearing En Banc
St. John v. Attorney General of the USA
Double Crossing Liberty
Lebanon's Cedar of Truth
US President Barack Obama's True Citizenship Status and Eligibility to be President Still Unresolved
Letters to the Ambassadors of Kenya & Indonesia on Barack Obama's Qualifications to be US President
USAF EC-135N & EGYPTAIR Flight 990: Precursors of Remote Controlled Flights of 9/11?
In Memoriam: Yitzhak Rabin, Peacemaker
Eidelberg Column in The Jewish Press argues for the Overthrow of the Rabin Government
Incitement for Assassination of President Asad is in Violation of the Law!
Letter on Newt Gingrich's Law of the Jungle
TWA Flight 800 Ten Years On
Photo of Cruise Missile that shot down TWA Flight 800
Cybernetic Telecommunications Piracy, The Boeing Company, & the Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370
Letter to Putin
Letters to the Dutch Government on the 2014 Shoot-down of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 over Ukraine
Virginia Tech Massacre: Any Lessons Learned?
Mughniyah Assassination coincides with Brzezinski/Rand Corporation Visit with Asad in Damascus!
Hear, oh Muslims! Hear!
In Memoriam: Helen Thomas, an honest, fair, accurate and courageous journalist
Alex Odeh Assassination File
Alex Odeh Assassination File: The Cartoon
New Olympic Event: Georgian Tie Eating
Hollywood Black Bag Job on the Iranians
FLASHBACK! Letter to Warren Christopher on NY Times Golan maps & Golan wine, dated December 29,1992
Editors of The Jewish Press compared President of the USA with Pharaoh back in 1998!
Stephen M. St. John for President of USA 2012
Governors Island in New York Harbor: Site of UN Military Staff Committee Headquarters?
Corporate Advertising on Legal Tender. Mind over Matter. Mind over Money. Mind over Deficit!
Magi Blowout Sale! Xmas Jingle, Middle East Peace & Security for Ersatz Israel!
Historic Schlesinger Letter points to Angleton/Eliot Same Man Theory!
Letter from Arthur Schlesinger Jr.
Letter to Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.
E-mail to BBC's Rowena Thursby concerning Dr. David Kelly, Princess Diana & CIA's Angleton/Eliot
Broadsheet protesting "Shock & Awe" Attack on Iraq
March 2001 Fax on Angleton/Eliot Same Man Theory
2 February 1989 Reply from Princess Diana's Lady-in-Waiting Anne Beckwith-Smith
Letter to Mary Jo White on Jonathan Pollard & Marc Rich
Correspondence from the British Royal Family and British Government regarding my peace proposal.
British Bombers dressed as Arabs and caught in the Act!
Judith Miller on Joseph M. Demarest, Jr.
Will? Is that you, Will?
Red Heifer Sighted?
Jesus: Don't be called "Rabbi"! Call no man "Father" on this earth!
Is Harry Potter hawking the British Coronation Throne?
Bowl of Stupid
Why doesn't the City of San Jose fly the national flag according to the law?
Letter of Recommendation from Dr. Frank Przetacznik
1993 Letter from Government of Lebanon
To be announced!
To be announced soon!
US Rewards for Justice: An International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal
Rewards for Justice & an International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal

Alas!  The three judge appellate panel has denied the following petition, which was filed on 27 October 2010. The Court's order to deny the motion for reconsideration is not dated, but the response arrived in an envelope postmarked 17 November 2010 from zip code 10007.
24 November 2010.




                                                                                     :                  10-3022

STEPHEN M. ST. JOHN, Pro Se,                                 :


          Plaintiff-Appellant                                                :   PETITION FOR

                                                                                     :   REHEARING

                                                                                     :    EN BANC

          -against-                                                               :




ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.;                                                  :

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, SDNY,                        :

PREETINDER BHARARA;                                            :




THIS COMPLAINT,                                                        :


          Defendants-Appellees                                             :




1)      Pursuant to Rule 35(b)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Plaintiff-Appellant Stephen M. St. John respectfully submits to this Court a Petition for the rare privilege of a Rehearing En Banc because the proceeding involves questions of exceptional importance that are in the public interest and go to the heart of good governance, the war on “terrorism” and the war on state sponsored “shock and awe.”

2)      The Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner is shocked and dismayed upon notification of the 13 October 2010 order to dismiss the appeal by Circuit Judges Robert David Sack, Barrington Daniels Parker, Jr. and Reena Raggi.  He assures this Court that the issues presented in his brief filed on 24 September 2010 are neither frivolous nor malicious but are compelling and of great moment and in the interests of both justice and our national security.  This brief is now published at with photos and links added.

3)      The Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner’s action is solidly based in law and fact. Basic astronomy and geometry and the sun’s shadows demonstrate that the 9/11 “Dulles Airport” video surveillance tape used by the Defendants-Appellees to promote the false and misleading 9/11 Commission Report in 2004 and to convict Zacharias Moussaoui in 2006 is a total fraud.  Using a bogus video surveillance tape to frame Arabs for unspeakable crimes in order to start wars is a treasonous war crime as any impartial jury will certainly agree.  (Please see photos page 4.)

4)      The Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner is not asking for the moon, but a chance to confront the Defendants-Appellees with his evidence in a moment of truth.

5)      Furthermore, the remedies sought by the Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner and reiterated in his 24 September 2010 brief are reasonable, forward looking, corrective, collaborative and in the best interests of justice, our national security and our nation’s proper standing as a sovereign equal among sovereign equals.

6)      The Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner reminds this Court of its duty to prevent force and fraud and to act accordingly right here and right now.  Otherwise, preventing a legal discovery process with respect to the purported 9/11 “Dulles Airport” video surveillance tape will only call into question the integrity of this Court and make it appear to be a mere instrument of a sovereign power infamously and globally defined by its full spectrum force and fraud.

7)      The Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner also reminds this Court that one purpose of the Judiciary is to check the excesses of the executive and legislative branches of government and if in this case this is not done right here and right now such a constitutional crisis will expose our nation to adventitious outcomes.

8)      The Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner advises this Court of the necessity to clarify for the public the difference between a ruse de guerre and a ruse à commencer une guerre.  The Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner’s action provides the opportunity to do so.  The Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner’s 24 September 2010 brief shows in partial measure an action program to take our nation to war without real justification.  One component of this action program is the bogus 9/11 “Dulles Airport” video surveillance tape.  This evidence is just the tip of the iceberg.

9)      The wise advice seen on New York City subway posters to heighten security awareness - “If you see something, say something” - goes to the heart of the matter.  Herein is the essence of what still promises to be a landmark case of a solitary citizen standing at the gates of justice and shaking the nations of the earth from extremely strong delusion about 9/11.  But what kind of jurisprudence denies a watchman’s approach, let alone his warning?  In a very real sense all citizens who see something and say something have proper standing and a corresponding natural right to a responsive government.  Amendments IX and X of the Constitution of the United States guarantee that no law or statute or decision can deny the Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner’s right to a responsive government, let alone reasonable relief that leads in this case to exposure of treasonous, warmongering fraud and rewards his vigilance, loyalty and perseverance against all odds and under circumstances never before encountered or even imagined.

10)    Let this Court affirm en banc that our government is a government of the people, by the people and for the people, and that no citizen with a good cause can be hermetically sealed from the process of justice under any circumstances.


                                                          Respectfully submitted,


                                                          Stephen M. St. John, Pro Se



DATED:     27 October 2010

Stephen M. St. John


Newark, CA 94560                          

Telephone:  XXX XXX XXXX

          Fax:   XXX XXX XXXX       



Edited Dulles Airport AA Flight 77 Suspect lower left


The photo above is a still taken from a video surveillance tape that was presented as evidence by the US Department of Justice at the trial of Zacharias Moussaoui in 2006.  The US Government falsely said the video shows five Arabs arriving at Washington Dulles International Airport on the morning of 11 September 2001 shortly before they boarded American Airlines Flight 77 which they hijacked and crashed.  But as Google Earth’s satellite imagery shows below at right, the parallel main runways at Dulles go north/south at 10 and 190 degree headings and ground passengers come and go at the north face of the Main Terminal which is between the runways and directly adjacent to the access road.  How, then, can one explain the sun’s shadow (a close-up appears below, left) cast by a passerby in the far background of the film?  The shadow points toward the north face of the Main Terminal!  This is impossible when the sun rises in the east and casts shadows westward as it did on the morning of 9/11.  Therefore, the video is bogus in that it could not possibly have been made at Dulles, but was filmed elsewhere and then falsely presented to a jury as a Dulles video.  See


Edited Dulles Airport from 13045 feet


Edited Dulles Airport Pedestrian outside terminal casts very long shadow at 180 heading.



Thank you for visiting!
Please come back soon!

* * * * * * *
©  Stephen M. St. John 2007, 2022
All original articles written by Stephen M. St. John and published on this website and its forerunner are fully protected by copyright law.  All rights are reserved.  However, non-commercial dissemination of these articles is allowed and encouraged so long as there is no change to the text or its meaning and proper attribution is given to the author, Stephen M. St. John.  Requests for commercial republication should be directed to the author through the contact information given below.  The author is not responsible for any changes made to the contents of this website without his awareness and consent, and will as soon as possible restore the true content if and when such unauthorized changes are discovered.
Current (2022) contact information:
Telephone:  669 388 0931
For regular mail via USPS, please send to
Stephen M. St. John
Post Office Box 720274
San José, CA   95172
United States of America
For FedEx, UPS, Amazon, and other shipments, please send to:
Stephen M. St. John
Colonnade # 720274
200 South 3rd Street
San José, CA 95112-9998
(The San José contact information shown above supercedes all previous contact information that may appear in this website including the mailing addresses Post Office Box 449, Rockefeller Center, New York, NY 10185; Post Office Box 1223, Newark, CA 94560; the email address; and telephone numbers 212 534 5024, 917 519 2905 and 408 658 4717.)

* * * * * * *