A Day of Remembrance & Resolve to establish 9/11 Truth
to pursue Justice for all Victims of the Shock & Awe
attacks on New York and Washington and the wars that
the 11th of September 2021 is the twentieth anniversary of the Shock & Awe attacks on the United States; and
Co-Chairmen of the 9/11 Commission, Lee Hamilton and Thomas Kean, have stated publicly and published in their book Without
Precedent: the Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission (2007), that the 9/11 Commission was "set
up to fail"; and
WHEREAS, many competent
researchers find the official story of 9/11 to be false and misleading; and
Ray Griffin, whose book 9/11 Unmasked: An International Review Panel Investigation, focuses with
painstaking detail on 51 points that show the official story of 9/11 to be false and misleading, brings us to the logical
conclusions that :
1. The Word
Trade Center buildings WTC 1 and WTC 2 and WTC 7 were brought down by controlled demolitions and not because of the impacts
of the jets, the resultant fires, and gravity only;
2. The then Mayor of New York City, Sir Rudolf Giuliani, had foreknowledge
of the collapses of the Twin Towers WTC 1 and WTC 2, and the British Broadcasting Corporation had foreknowledge of the collapse
of the Salomon Brothers building, WTC 7;
3. The official stories of the flights of 9/11 cannot possibly be true, which points
to cybernetic telecommunications piracy and the commandeering of jets by remote control as the actual causes;
4. The stories
of cell and air phone calls from passengers on the allegedly hijacked jets of 9/11 cannot possibly be true, which also strongly
suggests cybernetic telecommunications piracy in the form of impersonations of passengers, hijackers, and crew with real-time
digital voice morphing software;
5. The total lack of credible surveillance video tapes of the 19 alleged hijackers
as well as of the passengers boarding the flights of 9/11 at Logan, Newark, and Dulles airports strongly indicates a global
community infected with NOVID-19 by certain members of the broadcast industry;
6. The official account of 9/11 is a complex
deception that continues to steer our ship of state;
7. A new and a real investigation of the events of 11 September
2001 is long overdue; and
WHEREAS, certain utterances of Donald John Trump in interviews with WWOR TV on 11
September 2001 and with German TV Channel N24 on 13 September 2001 reveal his participation in a false flag military
intelligence operation to frame and blame Arab Semites and Muslims for the Shock & Awe attacks on New York and
Washington on 11 September 2001, and thereby fabricate with his fake news a pretext for invasions, occupations, and wars in
the Middle East; and
WHEREAS, Donald Trump's false claim in his WWOR TV interview on 11 September 2001 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt-ldMj9y9w)
that the structures of the World Trade Center Twin Towers, WTC 1 and WTC 2, lacked central core columns and were built "like
a can of soup," was fake news to prepare the public to accept the false and misleading "pancaking" theory of
collapse of the Twin Towers. This "pancaking" theory became part of the false and misleading
official story of 9/11 in 2004 and again in 2008 with the National Institute of Standards & Technology's report, which
was the result of an ex post facto law that is illegal under our Constitution of the United States; and
Trump, in his interview with German TV Channel N24 on 13 September 2001 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoYXihwcp8c),
said he had about 225 of his men working in the rubble of the Ground Zero crime scene "to get rid of what's there."
The Ground Zero crime scene was under the control of the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert Mueller,
who, 16 years later, would become Trump's Russiagate Grand Inquisitor! Did Trump and Mueller collude
to clean the crime scene of black boxes from the attacking aircrafts as well as evidence of controlled demolitions in order
to shore up the false and misleading "pancaking" theory of collapse of the Twin Towers as the result of the jet
impacts, the subsequent fires, and gravity only?; and
such a plan to frame and blame Arab Semites and Muslims so as to wage aggressive wars against them is actionable under Principle
VI(a)(i) and VI(a)(ii) of the Nuremberg Principles; and
WHEREAS, the born again Taliban government in
Afghanistan should remind Western nations that on 22 September 2001, the Taliban government responded to the ultimatum and
threats of United States President George W. Bush by offering to hand over Osama Bin Laden on condition that evidence of his
and Al Qa'ida's involvement in the attacks of 9/11 be shown to them first, and that Bush rejected this fair and reasonable
offer to avoid war so as to pursue his long-laid plans to wage aggressive wars in the Middle East in furtherance of certain
private interests and against international law, and that this malfeasance on the part of President Bush is actionable under
Principle VI(a)(i) and VI(a)(ii) of the Nuremberg Principles (copies of Nuremberg Principles and ABC News report appear below);
NOW, THEREFORE, Citizen of the United States of America Stephen
M. St. John calls for a Day of Remembrance and Resolve to pursue Truth and Justice for all victims
of the attacks on New York and Washington and of the ensuing wars; and
FURTHERMORE, Citizen St. John calls for the establishment of an International 9/11 Nuremberg
Principles Tribunal as the right way to pursue the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about what really happened
on 11 September 2001, and to pursue justice with fair trials based on fact and law. For more information
Post Office Box 720274
San José, CA 95172
* * *
Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor
and liable to punishment.
The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international
law does not relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under international law.
The fact that a person who committed an act which
constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible Government official does not relieve him
from responsibility under international law.
The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior
does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.
charged with a crime under international law has the right to a fair trial on the facts and law.
The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable
as crimes under international law:
(a) Crimes against peace: (i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war
in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances; (ii) Participation in a common
plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
(b) War crimes: Violations of the laws
or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill treatment or deportation to slave-labour or for any other
purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war, of persons on the
seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation
not justified by military necessity.
(c) Crimes against humanity: Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and
other inhuman acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds, when such
acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war
Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle
VI is a crime under international law.
* * *
KEMPSTER and TYLER MARSHALL
22, 2001 12 AM PT
Afghanistan’s ruling Taliban rejected President
Bush’s ultimatum Friday, vowing to continue to protect Osama bin Laden and his terrorist followers even if that provokes
a war and the destruction of the regime.
of the Taliban’s refusal to comply with Bush’s blunt demands came from the regime’s ambassador to Pakistan,
who said there is no evidence linking Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda organization to the suicide hijackings that destroyed the
World Trade Center, damaged the Pentagon and killed more than 6,000 people.
“If there is no evidence and proof, we’re not prepared to give up Osama bin Laden,”
Abdul Salam Zaeef told a press conference in Islamabad, Pakistan’s capital.
for full article.
* * * * * * *