A 9/11 Timeline within a 9/11 Timeline

REAL JOURNALISM: Something BIG is missing from John Durham's Russiagate Probe
Something BIG is missing from John Durham's Russiagate Report
11 September 2021: A Day of Remembrance & Resolve
A Call to put Trump before an International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal
Slam the BREXIT Door shut on the Warmongers with an International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal
Lifting the Burdens of Falsehood & Deceit: Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorneys General of the USA
Trump-Mueller-Giuliani 9/11 Conflicts of Interest
Mueller-Trump Conflict of Interest: An Opening for a 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal
Trump-Mueller Conflict of Interest
Preventing WWIII with a 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal
Hierosolyma: An Eight Part Peace Proposal for Greater Jerusalem
Beth El Is the Correct, Prophesied Location for the Real Israel's Next Temple
Constitution of the USA Offers Model Legal Mechanism for Conflict Resolution Among Nations
An Eight Part Peace Proposal for Greater Jerusalem Copyrights
ERSATZ ISRAEL: On those who say they are Jews, but are not.
KHAZARS from the Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th edition
The Talmudic Law of the Moser
Julius Rosenberg & the Talmudic Law of the Moser (Informer)
Fax Broadcasts 2005 & Before
Fax Broadcasts 2006
Fax Broadcasts 2007
Fax Broadcasts 2008
Letter to Chief Justice Rehnquist on George H. W. Bush & the JFK Assassination, 31 January 2005
Primary Documentary Evidence Showing Bush in Dallas & helping Jack Ruby spin Oswald's public Persona
USS Liberty Survivor fights for Truth, Justice & End of Cover-up
USS Liberty Incident: "The Missing Piece of the Middle East Peace Puzzle"
USS Liberty Documentary
US Army Intelligence Officer reveals Suppression of Analysts' Findings on USS Liberty Incident
FLASHBACK: Peled statement that 1967 Six Day War was in effect Dayan's "private venture"!
Arabic Numerals
Complaint of Judicial Misconduct against U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge A. Jay Cristol
Petition for Review of Chief Judge's Dismissal of Complaint
Letter of advice to the clerk of the court:
Letter of request to clerk of the court for permission to donate case file
Reply to court's request for inventory of documents to be donated.
Follow up to edit court's summary of inventory of documents to be donated.
Letter to Rush Limbaugh on the 15th Anniversary of 9/11
A 9/11 Timeline within a 9/11 Timeline
Submission to the House of Lords Select Committee on Communications
The Praxis of Evil's Other Form of Telecommunications Hacking
The extraordinarily strange Odyssey of Professor Peter Bowal
Eyewitness Account of Judicial Conference on morning of 11 September 2001
9/11: Another Look
A Dissenting Critique of the 9/11 Commission Report
The Mastermind Behind 9/11?
Complaint to FCC on CNN's Bias Against "9/11 Truthers"
8 June 2012 Letter to District Attorney in San Jose, California
Open Letters on 9/11 to Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
Certified Letter to US Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey
Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
Highly Recommended Documentary Films on 9/11
Alex Jones's Interview with Colonel Donn de Grand Pre
Barbarians Inside the Gates
Schlock & Awe on Top of Shock & Awe: NIST Report on WTC 7
President Bush twice said he saw the first jet hit the north tower World Trade Center 1
9/11 Dutch Treat?
Was 9/11 an Inside Job?
Citizen Investigation Team
911 Index
ARTICLE RETRACTED: "Dulles Airport" Shadow casts Doubt on US Government's 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Letter to Chief Judge William B. Traxler, Jr., U. S. Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit, Richmond, VA
ARTICLE RETRACTED: "Dulles Airport" Shadow disproves US Government's 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Complaint against US Department of Justice et al. for 9/11 Fraud UPDATED 24 MAY 2010
USCA, 2nd Circuit, 10-3022
St. John v US DoJ et al. Plaintiff-Appellant Brief
Petition for Rehearing En Banc
St. John v. Attorney General of the USA
Double Crossing Liberty
Lebanon's Cedar of Truth
US President Barack Obama's True Citizenship Status and Eligibility to be President Still Unresolved
Letters to the Ambassadors of Kenya & Indonesia on Barack Obama's Qualifications to be US President
USAF EC-135N & EGYPTAIR Flight 990: Precursors of Remote Controlled Flights of 9/11?
In Memoriam: Yitzhak Rabin, Peacemaker
Eidelberg Column in The Jewish Press argues for the Overthrow of the Rabin Government
Incitement for Assassination of President Asad is in Violation of the Law!
Letter on Newt Gingrich's Law of the Jungle
TWA Flight 800 Ten Years On
Photo of Cruise Missile that shot down TWA Flight 800
Cybernetic Telecommunications Piracy, The Boeing Company, & the Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370
Letter to Putin
Letters to the Dutch Government on the 2014 Shoot-down of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 over Ukraine
Virginia Tech Massacre: Any Lessons Learned?
Mughniyah Assassination coincides with Brzezinski/Rand Corporation Visit with Asad in Damascus!
Hear, oh Muslims! Hear!
In Memoriam: Helen Thomas, an honest, fair, accurate and courageous journalist
Alex Odeh Assassination File
Alex Odeh Assassination File: The Cartoon
New Olympic Event: Georgian Tie Eating
Hollywood Black Bag Job on the Iranians
FLASHBACK! Letter to Warren Christopher on NY Times Golan maps & Golan wine, dated December 29,1992
Editors of The Jewish Press compared President of the USA with Pharaoh back in 1998!
Stephen M. St. John for President of USA 2012
Governors Island in New York Harbor: Site of UN Military Staff Committee Headquarters?
Corporate Advertising on Legal Tender. Mind over Matter. Mind over Money. Mind over Deficit!
Magi Blowout Sale! Xmas Jingle, Middle East Peace & Security for Ersatz Israel!
Historic Schlesinger Letter points to Angleton/Eliot Same Man Theory!
Letter from Arthur Schlesinger Jr.
Letter to Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.
E-mail to BBC's Rowena Thursby concerning Dr. David Kelly, Princess Diana & CIA's Angleton/Eliot
Broadsheet protesting "Shock & Awe" Attack on Iraq
March 2001 Fax on Angleton/Eliot Same Man Theory
2 February 1989 Reply from Princess Diana's Lady-in-Waiting Anne Beckwith-Smith
Letter to Mary Jo White on Jonathan Pollard & Marc Rich
Correspondence from the British Royal Family and British Government regarding my peace proposal.
British Bombers dressed as Arabs and caught in the Act!
Judith Miller on Joseph M. Demarest, Jr.
Will? Is that you, Will?
Red Heifer Sighted?
Jesus: Don't be called "Rabbi"! Call no man "Father" on this earth!
Is Harry Potter hawking the British Coronation Throne?
Bowl of Stupid
Why doesn't the City of San Jose fly the national flag according to the law?
Letter of Recommendation from Dr. Frank Przetacznik
1993 Letter from Government of Lebanon
To be announced!
To be announced soon!
US Rewards for Justice: An International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal
Rewards for Justice & an International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal

Did Laughter of the Judges make the WTC Towers 1, 2 & 7 fall on 9/11?
A 9/11 Timeline within a 9/11 Timeline

Perceptive political observers have noted a time-line of about one year's duration ending with the attacks of 9/11.  This time-line began in September 2000 with the publication by the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) of a Zionist Neoconservative position paper entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses.  Soon after 9/11 these astute observers recalled a suggestion in this PNAC position paper that a "new Pearl Harbor" type of event will expedite an otherwise slow transformation of programs to reach the overarching goal, which is domination of the world by the military might of the USA.
And so a time-line of approximately one year extends from the call for a "new Pearl Harbor" to the attacks of 9/11.  Within this time-line a progression of events is noted and these events are described as linked.  Other papers reflecting the PNAC's ideology of military domination of the world or explaining its origins predate this September 2000 to September 2001 time-line, but for the present purpose, only this time-line and certain events that took place afterwards are considered.
My purpose here is to overlay this September 2000 to September 2001 time-line with another time-line of my own, which is based on a legal proceeding in the US Court of Appeals and Judicial Council of the 11th Circuit in Atlanta.  The narrative I give suggests how the date of 11 September 2001 was chosen in the context of the larger September 2000 to September 2001 time-line.
The salient points of the September 2000 to September 2001 time-line begin with the PNAC document calling for a "new Pearl Harbor" to actuate the recommendations in this position paper.  A signatory of this provocative document is Dov Zakheim, who is also at this time the foreign policy adviser of presidential candidate George W. Bush.  (It will also be noted in the days and weeks immediately after 9/11 that the attacking aerial vehicles were very likely flown by remote control, and now we see in retrospect that Dov Zakheim has a strong background in remote control technologies associated with the military industrial complex through System Planning Corporation.)
Candidate Bush derided the notion of nation building, but once in the White House, at his very first National Security Council meeting in early February 2001, he essentially directed his administration to use the sovereign powers of the USA to find a way to take Iraq.  Then Secretary of the Treasury Paul O'Neill is witness to this betrayal of trust of the American people and out and out violation of international law and the Nuremberg Principles.
Next Zakheim was elevated to Undersecretary of Defense and Comptroller of the Pentagon, where his Zionist Neoconservative motives blended with the means of Department of Defense resources and the opportunities afforded at the nexus of the nation's command, control and communications systems, as well as the Zionist and Zionist-friendly network permeating this governmental architecture.  In this regard it should be pointed out that the Zionist led software company Ptech was for two years leading up to 9/11 busy installing on major US government computer systems programs where means of infiltration for the purposes of monitoring and intervention could have easily been introduced.  This explains the US government's flat-footed response on 9/11.  And it also needs to be recalled how on 10 September 2001 Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld announced that $2.3 trillion could not be accounted for by Dov Zakheim's Comptroller department.  The events of the very next day caused many to forget this colossal swindle on the scale of the September 2008 financial attack on the USA.
Right about the time Zakheim settled into the Comptroller's office at the Pentagon is when my narrative begins with the federal appeals court in Atlanta.  By then a certain momentum had already been built in the main time-line of which I was at the time entirely unaware.  Other events occurred, but still I could not connect the dots.  Bush had given his signal to take Iraq, and now Zionists would cause a Zionist to lease the problematic World Trade Center for 99 years just 49 days before 9/11.  Nearly eight years later we learned of the discovery of military grade nano thermitic explosive residue in dust samples provided by local residents living near Ground Zero in New York.  These explosives could not possibly have come from a tent or cave in Afghanistan, and there is little doubt they were used after George W. Bush had given the order to find a way to go into Iraq.  A pretext for war had been fabricated to comply with Bush's order, and to attain the Zionist Neoconservative goal of putting American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol.
Clear evidence of a self-inflicted wound -- a military intelligence false flag operation -- has been shown but is still ignored by those with proper jurisdiction or sufficient influence to initiate a full, fair and impartial investigation of this crime of this young century.
I present my time-line as a material witness and to give fuller context to discussions of motivation to commit the crimes of 9/11.
So here's a 9/11 time line that will surprise you.  It begins with a letter to the editor published in the New York Times of 30 April 2001:
    '67 Attack on the Liberty
     To the Editor:
Re "Book Says Israel Intended 1967 Attack on U.S. Ship" (news article, April 23):  James Bamford's book "Body of Secrets" indicates that the attack on the United States intelligence ship Liberty by Israel in 1967 was intended.
I researched this matter for 13 years.  I analyzed 10 official United States investigations of the incident by the Central Intelligence Agency, the United States Navy, the President's Foreign Intelligence Board, the Department of Defense and the National Security Agency, plus five Congressional investigations.  They all came to the same conclusion, as did three official Israeli investigations:  The attack was a tragic mistake, or there is no evidence that it was intentional.
A. Jay Cristol
Miami, April 23, 200
The writer is a federal judge in the Southern District of Florida.
Not wanting to let this fraud pass unchallenged, I filed a complaint of judicial misconduct against Judge Cristol, as shown below (next 8 pages).  The law that I invoked, 28 United States Code § 372(c), was changed as of 2 November 2002 and is now known as 28 United States Code §§ 351 - 364.
Click here for easier to read copies of the following five pages.
The decision of the Chief Judge was swift, nitpicking as to the relativity of my misuse of the term "color of the law" and fully abstentious on the heavier matters of my complaint.  (See next two pages.)
webassets/Image.jpg webassets/Image__6_.jpg
I therefore exercised my prerogative to petition the Judicial Council for review of the Chief Judge's dismissal of my complaint as "frivolous."  Click here for easier to read copy of text.
The Court received and accepted my petition.
At this time I also phoned a request to Judge Cristol for a copy of his original letter of 23 April 2001 to the Editor of the New York Times.  Such a simple request left with his assistant who answered the phone resulted in this rather convoluted response.
Based on previous experience in petitioning the judicial councils of the 2nd and 7th circuits for review of chief appellate judges' decisions in 1993 [93-8533 and 93-8534 in the 2nd Circuit and 93-7-372-22 in the 7th Circuit], I expected a swift reply from this Judicial Council of the 11th Circuit in Atlanta.
But by 20 July, nearly three full weeks after properly submitting my petition, I began to hope that the Judicial Council would exercise its prerogative to launch its own investigation or even introduce the matter to the highest level, the Judicial Conference, which meets once a year with the Chief Justice of the United States presiding.
The text box below shows that part of the law empowering the Judicial Council to refer complaints such as mine to the Judicial Conference.  Click the text box or this link for the full text of the law:  Note well that the Judicial Council's requirement to notify both the complainant and the judge whose conduct is the subject of the complaint is not absolute; in the interests of justice such notification may be withheld.
28 U.S.C. 354(b)
Entirely unbeknownst to me at the time, the Judicial Conference was set to meet on the morning of 11 September 2001 in the US Supreme Court Building.
Just as my hopes were kindled by the Judicial Council's delayed response, I also realized that Judge Cristol must have been a bit apprehensive about what was taking so long within the Judicial Council. 
Judge Cristol surely knew that the Judicial Council could very well refer my petition/complaint to the Judicial Conference without informing him, the complained-of judge, and me, the petitioner and complainant.  He also knew that a major victory for the USS Liberty Veterans Association -- tantamount to a public relations disaster for the Zionists -- was hanging in the balance!  Such a victory on a very long campaign to establish historic truth and the proper administration of justice would certainly result in loss of support for the Zionists in the USA as more and more Americans become aware of the true nature of the attack on the USS Liberty and the Zionists' abysmal behavior toward the USS Liberty survivors, their families and friends.
But as the Zionists like to say, "God does not play with dice."  Why take any chances when a little bit of "shock and awe" would do the trick?
It is in this context that one must consider the strange press conference on 24 July 2001 in which Governor of New York State George Pataki announced Larry Silverstein's 99 year lease on the World Trade Center.  I say "strange" not just because there was the appearance of schmoozing cronyism, but because the World Trade  Center was considered a "White Elephant" with regulatory and ordinance problems galore!  Why take on such long term commitments requiring very expensive undertakings such as asbestos removal?  To demolish and rebuild was the best solution.
Well, the head of the Port Authority who handed Silverstein the keys to the WTC just happened to be an ardent Zionist and prominent official of the Republican Party.  Lewis Eisenberg was very likely already aware of what Secretary of the Treasury Paul O'Neill would later reveal in January 2004; namely, that President George W. Bush at his very first National Security Council meeting in early February 2001 declared his intention to invade and occupy Iraq and demanded that a way be found to do this!  And so the main objective of creating a pretext for putting American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol was realized on 9/11.  And of course Lucky Larry Silverstein, another avid Zionist, made vast returns on his initial terrorism insurance premium 49 days later on 9/11!  The text box below is clickable and will take you to the 24 July 2001 press release on the Port Authority website.
In the meantime, on 23 July 2001 -- exactly one day before Governor Pataki's World Trade Center news conference -- I took a little excursion out of the power center of New York City to Washington DC where I attended a small gathering at the Army Navy Club as the guest of former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Thomas H. Moorer (Requiescat in pace).
The wide open skies of Washington make me feel I'm in the country.  I picked a daisy from a flower box on the way to the Army Navy ClubDaisies.jpg, and upon my somewhat early arrival there I sat in a lounge and started to pluck each of the daisy's petals one by one.  For each petal plucked, I would alternately whisper, "The Judicial Council is taking my petition quite seriously" and "The Judicial Council, like the Chief Judge, finds my complaint "frivolous" and they are all having a good laugh!"
Nearly a full month had gone by with no response to my petition for review of the Chief Judge's decision.  Completely unaware of the 49 day countdown from Silverstein's lease of the World Trade Center to 9/11, and completely unaware of the Judicial Conference also set for 8:30AM that fateful day, I reported on my trip to Washington and the Army Navy Club to the Judicial Council because the proceedings there had, as shown below in the next three pages, direct bearing on the matter currently before the judges.  For easier to read copies of next two pages, click here.
Because this correspondence became part of the case file, I am sure that Judge Cristol was apprised of it.
Footnote:  Soon after Brassey's Inc. published Cristol's book The Liberty Incident in 2002 (based on his 1997 University of Miami dissertation of the same title), Captain Ward Boston, who had been the legal counsel of the US Navy Court of Inquiry into the USS Liberty incident, formally repudiated the Navy Court of Inquiry's falsified findings and politically driven conclusions as well as Judge Cristol and his book.
I dare to say that, like most Americans, all the chief judges of the 11th Circuit Judicial Council, listed below on the next three pages, lack Talmud awareness.  The Talmud, unlike the Torah, elevates Jews above non-Jews and permits certain liberties that we Americans would deem criminal.  Of special concern to judges should be the Talmudic Law of the Moser, whereby a Jew is prohibited from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew, directly or indirectly.  This very real practice, not unlike the Mafioso Code of Omertà, is diametrically opposed to our legal system, and should also be of concern to our intelligence and law enforcement communities.  The Talmudic Law of the Moser is essentially a conspiracy of silence conducive to obstruction of justice.  One cannot fully understand 9/11 or the USS Liberty incident or the assassination of JFK without taking the Talmudic Law of the Moser into account.  Click to learn more about the Talmudic Law of the Moser.  Also, anyone on the Internet can audit Talmud 101 at this very excellent website  This should be a mandatory exercise for judicial, law enforcement and intelligence officers.
Then came 9/11!  Again, at the time, I had no idea the Judicial Conference was meeting that very morning!
After the attacks in New York City, when the south tower WTC2 had already collapsed and the north tower WTC1 was still standing, CBS News reported on 1010WINS radio that Fox News had just announced that there was an explosion near the Supreme Court Building in Washington.  While it is true that US Marshalls evacuated Chief Justice Rehnquist and 26 of the most senior federal chief judges from a side entrance onto the street, no such explosion occurred.  Why would Fox News report an explosion if one had not occurred?  Why would CBS News repeat this lie on 1010WINS radio in New York City?  Richard Siegel's video of the demolition of the WTC Twin Towers, besides being best evidence that complements and validates seismic readings of massive explosions before and during the buildings' collapses, has 1010WINS radio playing in the background throughout the recording, and several anomalies stand out in the news broadcasting which should be the subject of an investigation.  You can obtain Siegel's videos at  
Judicial Fellow and University of Calgary Professor of Law Peter Bowal gives a very interesting eyewitness account of what actually transpired that morning at the Judicial Conference inside the Supreme Court Building.  Click
The text box below is clickable and will take you directly to the US Courts website where you can read about the Judicial Conference Proceedings that were scheduled for - but postponed - the very day the towers fell.  On page 68 you will see that the Committee to Review Circuit Council Conduct and Disability Orders dealt only with action by the Judicial Council of the District of Columbia in August  2001 relative to a complaint filed in April 2001.  But again, one must remember that the Judicial Council was free to withhold notification in the interests of justice, and here was a complaint that touched on the sovereign executive power vis à vis the assault on the USS Liberty and the subsequent taking of the "Little Maginot Line" atop Syria's Golan Heights in less than 24 hours!  This matter is "eyes only" and I certainly had no notification of referral to the Judicial Conference.  Nor have I had any notification of peace in the Middle East!  Rather, 9/11 spawned nothing but war for eight years and still counting.
Nearly four months after 9/11 (six full months after filing my petition) the decision of the Judicial Council upholding the Chief Judge's dismissal of my original complaint as "frivolous" finally came on 7 January 2002.  (See next two pages.)
Entertaining such frivolity for so very long must have generated such laughter that the vibrations culminating on 11 September 2001 -- perhaps at the Judicial Conference that convened that very day -- brought the towers down! 
Unless, of course, you prefer to believe eyewitness, photographic, audio, seismic and material evidence of explosions as the real, purely scientific cause as demonstrated by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth at  Such explosives could only have been planted under the nose of the new landlord of seven weeks, Larry Silverstein, and not by a man in a tent or cave in Afghanistan!  Proof of military grade nano-thermitic explosives residue in dust samples provided by local residents near Ground Zero in New York came from the Department of Chemistry of the University of Copenhagen on 6 April 2009.  Relevant links to this smoking gun evidence are provided in Open Letter #11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder at
As these court documents show, precisely when the Zionists were facing the very real threat of exposure of their shameful deceitfulness and manipulations with respect to the USS Liberty incident, they quite suddenly turned the tables and realized a coup that soon put American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol, which had long been their goal. The Zionists had the motive, means and opportunity to pull off 9/11 and blame the attacks on the Arabs.  Instead of being put under proper scrutiny, they have led the investigations and judicial proceedings!  In this regard, I refer the reader to my Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey at
At this point, I figured that a reasonable, last resort option would be to secure my case file for donation to an institution of higher learning, where scholars could make their own independent judgments in a much larger, historical context.  Click here for easier to read copy of the next page.
I sent a copy of my request for permission to donate my case file to Judge Cristol at his home address, which he had given me back in 1991 when we met in Washington, DC, at a reunion of the USS Liberty Veterans Association.  The magic of those moments when we sat together at a banquet and schmoozed in the hotel lobby and conference rooms now lost, the letter was returned with no reason given.  There are only scrawled initials which I cannot read.
It soon became apparent that at least one party was open to my idea.  I admired the court's cautious approach in this matter.  (See next five pages.)
Click here for easier to read copies of the following four page reply to the court's request for an inventory of documents to be donated.
Around this time I had a fortune cookie that read, "You have great attention to detail."  (See next four pages.)
So too did the court have great attention to detail!  (See next five pages and click here for easier to read copy of follow-up letter to edit court's summary of inventory of documents to be donated.)
Finally, the Court punted.  I gather that there was no agreement between Chief Judge Anderson and Judge Cristol over my wanting to bestow my case file on an institution of higher learning.  It appears to me that the Court was determined not to deny my wish for more light on the subject.  In further retrospect, I wonder what battles were fought under the pretext of national security in the spring and summer of 2002, and did they have anything to do with the inexplicable summary termination of Judicial Fellow Peter Bowal's fellowship at the US Supreme Court and his Professorship at the University of Calgary?  Was he collateral damage in the fight for truth and justice with respect to the USS Liberty and the Zionists' illegal occupation of the Golan Heights?  Click
Six months later, in October 2002, I obtained my very first laptop computer and was on the Internet regularly.  (It so happened that my boss, Marion Britton, who supposedly perished on United Flight 93, had encouraged me in my query about taking out a loan, which I subsequently did, to purchase the laptop.)  I quickly found out that in the 1930s Herbert Hoover actively advocated ethnic cleansing of Palestine to make room for the Zionists and therefore decided that I did not want to donate my case file to an institution named after him.  I also communicated my concern that the USS Liberty Veterans Association would have an archive in an institution -- the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University -- so linked with illegal Zionist objectives.  I suggested that the Kennedy School of Government would be more apt to generate scholarly activity in support of their noble quest for the establishment of historical truth and the proper administration of justice.  (See
Field of Daisies

Thank you for visiting!
Please come back soon!

* * * * * * *
©  Stephen M. St. John 2007, 2022
All original articles written by Stephen M. St. John and published on this website and its forerunner are fully protected by copyright law.  All rights are reserved.  However, non-commercial dissemination of these articles is allowed and encouraged so long as there is no change to the text or its meaning and proper attribution is given to the author, Stephen M. St. John.  Requests for commercial republication should be directed to the author through the contact information given below.  The author is not responsible for any changes made to the contents of this website without his awareness and consent, and will as soon as possible restore the true content if and when such unauthorized changes are discovered.
Current (2022) contact information:
Telephone:  669 388 0931
For regular mail via USPS, please send to
Stephen M. St. John
Post Office Box 720274
San José, CA   95172
United States of America
For FedEx, UPS, Amazon, and other shipments, please send to:
Stephen M. St. John
Colonnade # 720274
200 South 3rd Street
San José, CA 95112-9998
(The San José contact information shown above supercedes all previous contact information that may appear in this website including the mailing addresses Post Office Box 449, Rockefeller Center, New York, NY 10185; Post Office Box 1223, Newark, CA 94560; the email address; and telephone numbers 212 534 5024, 917 519 2905 and 408 658 4717.)

* * * * * * *