Metatron

US Army Intelligence Officer reveals Suppression of Analysts' Findings on USS Liberty Incident

Home
CONTACT
Hierosolyma: An Eight Part Peace Proposal for Greater Jerusalem
Beth El Is the Correct, Prophesied Location for the Real Israel's Next Temple
Constitution of the USA Offers Model Legal Mechanism for Conflict Resolution Among Nations
An Eight Part Peace Proposal for Greater Jerusalem Copyrights
SUBMISSION TO THE LAST SAVIOUR FESTIVAL BEING HELD IN TEHRAN, IRAN
ERSATZ ISRAEL: On those who say they are Jews, but are not.
KHAZARS from the Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th edition
TALMUD AWARENESS
The Talmudic Law of the Moser
Julius Rosenberg & the Talmudic Law of the Moser (Informer)
FAX BROADCASTS 2009
Fax Broadcasts 2005 & Before
Fax Broadcasts 2006
Fax Broadcasts 2007
Fax Broadcasts 2008
Letter to Chief Justice Rehnquist on George H. W. Bush & the JFK Assassination, 31 January 2005
Primary Documentary Evidence Showing Bush in Dallas & helping Jack Ruby spin Oswald's public Persona
USS Liberty Survivor fights for Truth, Justice & End of Cover-up
USS Liberty Incident: "The Missing Piece of the Middle East Peace Puzzle"
USS Liberty Documentary
US Army Intelligence Officer reveals Suppression of Analysts' Findings on USS Liberty Incident
FLASHBACK: Peled statement that 1967 Six Day War was in effect Dayan's "private venture"!
Arabic Numerals
Complaint of Judicial Misconduct against U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge A. Jay Cristol
Petition for Review of Chief Judge's Dismissal of Complaint
Letter of advice to the clerk of the court:
Letter of request to clerk of the court for permission to donate case file
Reply to court's request for inventory of documents to be donated.
Follow up to edit court's summary of inventory of documents to be donated.
Letter to Rush Limbaugh on the 15th Anniversary of 9/11
A 9/11 Timeline within a 9/11 Timeline
Submission to the House of Lords Select Committee on Communications
The Praxis of Evil's Other Form of Telecommunications Hacking
The extraordinarily strange Odyssey of Professor Peter Bowal
Eyewitness Account of Judicial Conference on morning of 11 September 2001
9/11: Another Look
A Dissenting Critique of the 9/11 Commission Report
The Mastermind Behind 9/11?
Complaint to FCC on CNN's Bias Against "9/11 Truthers"
8 June 2012 Letter to District Attorney in San Jose, California
Open Letters on 9/11 to Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
Certified Letter to US Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey
Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
Highly Recommended Documentary Films on 9/11
Alex Jones's Interview with Colonel Donn de Grand Pre
Barbarians Inside the Gates
Schlock & Awe on Top of Shock & Awe: NIST Report on WTC 7
President Bush twice said he saw the first jet hit the north tower World Trade Center 1
9/11 Dutch Treat?
Was 9/11 an Inside Job?
Citizen Investigation Team
911 Index
ARTICLE RETRACTED: "Dulles Airport" Shadow casts Doubt on US Government's 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Letter to Chief Judge William B. Traxler, Jr., U. S. Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit, Richmond, VA
ARTICLE RETRACTED: "Dulles Airport" Shadow disproves US Government's 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Complaint against US Department of Justice et al. for 9/11 Fraud UPDATED 24 MAY 2010
USCA, 2nd Circuit, 10-3022
St. John v US DoJ et al. Plaintiff-Appellant Brief
Petition for Rehearing En Banc
St. John v. Attorney General of the USA
Double Crossing Liberty
Lebanon's Cedar of Truth
US President Barack Obama's True Citizenship Status and Eligibility to be President Still Unresolved
Letters to the Ambassadors of Kenya & Indonesia on Barack Obama's Qualifications to be US President
USAF EC-135N & EGYPTAIR Flight 990: Precursors of Remote Controlled Flights of 9/11?
USAF EC-135N ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT
In Memoriam: Yitzhak Rabin, Peacemaker
Eidelberg Column in The Jewish Press argues for the Overthrow of the Rabin Government
Incitement for Assassination of President Asad is in Violation of the Law!
Letter on Newt Gingrich's Law of the Jungle
TWA Flight 800 Ten Years On
Photo of Cruise Missile that shot down TWA Flight 800
Cybernetic Telecommunications Piracy, The Boeing Company, & the Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370
Letter to Putin
Letters to Dutch Safety Board on the Shoot-down of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 over Ukraine
Virginia Tech Massacre: Any Lessons Learned?
Mughniyah Assassination coincides with Brzezinski/Rand Corporation Visit with Asad in Damascus!
Hear, oh Muslims! Hear!
In Memoriam: Helen Thomas, an honest, fair, accurate and courageous journalist
Alex Odeh Assassination File
Alex Odeh Assassination File: The Cartoon
New Olympic Event: Georgian Tie Eating
Hollywood Black Bag Job on the Iranians
FLASHBACK! Letter to Warren Christopher on NY Times Golan maps & Golan wine, dated December 29,1992
Editors of The Jewish Press compared President of the USA with Pharaoh back in 1998!
Stephen M. St. John for President of USA 2012
Governors Island in New York Harbor: Site of UN Military Staff Committee Headquarters?
Corporate Advertising on Legal Tender. Mind over Matter. Mind over Money. Mind over Deficit!
Magi Blowout Sale! Xmas Jingle, Middle East Peace & Security for Ersatz Israel!
Historic Schlesinger Letter points to Angleton/Eliot Same Man Theory!
Letter from Arthur Schlesinger Jr.
Letter to Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.
E-mail to BBC's Rowena Thursby concerning Dr. David Kelly, Princess Diana & CIA's Angleton/Eliot
Broadsheet protesting "Shock & Awe" Attack on Iraq
March 2001 Fax on Angleton/Eliot Same Man Theory
BLOODY BUSH CABAL BROUGHT US DALLAS 1963; WATERGATE 1972; BEIRUT 1982; BAGHDAD 1991 & 2003
2 February 1989 Reply from Princess Diana's Lady-in-Waiting Anne Beckwith-Smith
Letter to Mary Jo White on Jonathan Pollard & Marc Rich
Correspondence from the British Royal Family and British Government regarding my peace proposal.
British Bombers dressed as Arabs and caught in the Act!
Judith Miller on Joseph M. Demarest, Jr.
Will? Is that you, Will?
Red Heifer Sighted?
Jesus: Don't be called "Rabbi"! Call no man "Father" on this earth!
Is Harry Potter hawking the British Coronation Throne?
Bowl of Stupid
Why doesn't the City of San Jose fly the national flag according to the law?
Resumes
Letter of Recommendation from Dr. Frank Przetacznik
1993 Letter from Government of Lebanon
CONTACT
To be announced!
To be announced soon!

 

Lieutenant Colonel (Retired) Ralph R. Hoppe was Chief of the Middle East Intelligence section within the J2 Directorate, USCINCSTRIKE/USCINCMEAFSA at MacDill AFB in Tampa, Florida,when air and sea forces of the Zionist state attacked the USS Liberty, an electromagnetic surveillance ship monitoring the June 1967 Six Day War on an NSA mission.  Hoppe reveals in his background paper (below) that analysts in the J2 Directorate agreed unanimously with their counterparts at the Department of State, CIA, DIA and NSA in their independently made conclusions that the attack was deliberate.  Then Hoppe saw the cover-up begin before his very eyes, and points to Colonel Anthony Perna as the main suppressor of intelligence indicating a deliberate attack on a US Navy ship.  Perna was the US Military Attache at the US Embassy in Tel Aviv, and was "on leave" when he visited Washington and gathered all the evidence brought to the Pentagon with the intention of obstructing justice.

BACKGROUND PAPER (Second Revision, May 1, 1991)

Prepared by: LTC (Ret) Ralph R. Hoppe

Subject: Personal Synopsis of the USS Liberty Incident.

     1.   On the day of the Israeli attack upon the USS Liberty, June 8, 1967, I was Chief of the Middle East Intelligence section within the J2 Directorate, USCINCSTRIKE/USCINCMEAFSA, located at MacDill AFB, Tampa, Florida.  My duties at the time were focused upon the analyses of military/political/economic activities of the belligerents of the 1967 Arab-Israeli Six Day War which had commenced on June 5, 1967.

     2.   For those unfamiliar, the intelligence mission is essentially threefold:  collection of information; analysis of collected information and distribution of analyses (of which I was a part); and special operations (including, but not limited to "dirty tricks").  Most intelligence activities are conducted in a restrictive, cellular atmosphere and their output is distributed to the users (operational troops and decision makers) on a need-to-know basis.  Security classifications are absolutely necessary within the entire intelligence process to properly protect the identity of sources, whether they be PHOTINT, SIGINT or HUMINT.

     3.   Intelligence dissemination is therefore complicated.  Vital, available information can easily fall through the cracks, as it did during the USS Liberty tragedy, unless the whole team at all levels is determined to disseminate all facts in an unbiased manner.  Some problem areas are discussed below:

     a.   Dissemination bears many different types of security classifications to properly safeguard a myriad of sources.  As most people are aware, the common classifications are CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET and TOP SECRET, each having their own special handling instructions.  Higher classifications and/or more restrictive caveats are added to the documents commensurate with increased sensitivity of the sources.
 
     b.   Many documents contain more than one source.  In such cases, the entire document carries the classification of the most sensitive sources.

     c.   A series of documents covering the same subject may individually carry separate classifications from CONFIDENTIAL to the highest levels.

     d.   Most intelligence information arrives as incomplete spot reports from varied sources on a piece-meal basis.  Many spot reports are often needed to complete the picture.

     e.   Each document is delivered only to need-to-know persons having access to that classification.  It follows that as the sources become more and more sensitive, more and more people will be denied access to the information and will never know the existence of additional documents which make up the complete picture.

     f.   Conversely, those that possess the highest clearances (the President, SECSTATE, SECDEF, Dir CIA, Dir NSA, Dir DIA, etc., and their top horse-holders) are most often too busy with other tasks to do much more than read intelligence summaries of items considered significant by their analysts.  This system appears workable on first glance, but is ofttime compounded by strong differences within analytical processing as to which items can/should be considered significant.  (Let's face it!  Each batch of new intelligence information brings new twists to old methodologies.)

     4.   Israel won a major victory over the Arabs in the 1967 War.  Hostilities had been preceded by Arab threats, Egyptian closure of the Straits of Tiran, mobilization by both sides, and pull-out of UN peacekeeping forces.  On June 5, 1967, Israel initiated hostilities (verified by US intelligence) by invading the Sinai with ground forces and attacking airfields in the Sinai and elsewhere within Egypt.  By the time a ceasefire had been agreed upon at the end of 6 days, israel had seized and occupied the entire Sinai peninsula up to the Suez Canal, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and Jerusalem, and Syria's Golan Heights.  (The reader is reminded that these seized territories, with the exception of the Sinai, had been claimed publicly in 1948 by leading Zionist leaders – including later-to-become prime ministers Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir – as rightful parts of reconstructed eretz Israel, the Zionist historical homeland.)  One of the more interesting Israeli versions of the Liberty incident (inferring that secretive U.S./Israeli agreement had been seriously bungled by both sides) was written by Chaim Herzog (The Arab-Israeli Wars, Random House, N.Y., 1982).

     5.   Prior to the commencement of hostilities, President Johnson and SECSTATE Rusk openly pleaded with Israel to refrain from executing a preemptive strike; following the Israeli attack, the U.S. continued to openly press for an early cease-fire and separation of opposing forces.  Israel, winning handily from the start, paid lip-service to wanting an early end to hostilities, but it's clandestine, accelerated military movements left no doubt to U.S. intelligence that the Israelis weren't about ready to stop until they had achieved their planned objectives (which clearly coincided with the territories which they seized before accepting the cease-fire).  Upset with the Israeli deceit (or bungling previous secretive agreement), the U.S. increased its intelligence collection of Israeli activities.  The Israelis immediately objected to the U.S. action.

     6.   The USS Liberty was moved into the eastern Mediterranean to monitor both Arab and Israeli military activity.  For an outstanding account of the Liberty's activity before, during and after the Israeli attack by one of the ship's officers, read James Ennes, Jr., Assault on the Liberty, Random House, N.Y., 1979.

     7.   As the Liberty approached Israeli shores, Israeli Defense and Foreign ministries began pressuring the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv to ascertain whether it was an American ship and, if so, to determine why was there and what was its mission.  According to Israeli reports covered in the press, the U.S. Embassy initially pleaded ignorance to the ship's arrival, but promised that they were making every effort to get an answer.  (Most U.S. State Dept reports of that series of dialogues which I saw at the time were never divulged to the press, but certainly are available in permanent files and could settle the argument if the U.S. ever agreed to release them.)  The longer the U.S. delayed, the harder the Israelis pressed for an answer.  About 24 hours before the attack against the Liberty, the exasperated Israelis reportedly informed the U.S. Embassy that lacking any positive answers from the U.S. they could only assume that it was a belligerent ship which is fair game under the rules of warfare.

     8.   To further build their case, the Israelis claimed at the time that if it were not a U.S. ship, it was most probably an Egyptian ship (named al Kusayr/Kusair).  This claim was plain BS because the ship that they named was clearly identified in Janes Fighting Ships, a copy of which, I am sure, could be found in every Israeli ship and military headquarters.  (If Israeli pilots could differentiate between Egyptian and Israeli tanks, artillery and trucks in battle areas, they should certainly have been able to identify anything as large as the Egyptian ship in open water.)  Moreover, the configuration of the named Egyptian ship was considerably different from that of the USS Liberty.

     9.   Two first-rate analysts from our (STRIKE) intelligence section sensed quickly from in-coming reports that the attack upon the Liberty was deliberate.  (One of the analysts was an AF major, whose name I have forgotten, but which could be obtained from official records.  The other was an Army captain, William Kirby, who shortly thereafter transferred administratively from the Army to the Dept of State.  The last time I saw Kirby was September, 1974, in Tel Aviv, where he was assigned to the U.S. Embassy.)  We immediately contacted the U.S. analytical intelligence community in Washington D.C. (State, CIA, NSA and DIA) individually by secure telephone to get a consensus on our conclusion and were pleased to find that the community's analytical personnel (our counterparts) unanimously agreed that the Israeli attack was deliberate, not accidental.  Their analyses, too, had been performed independently and included all available "raw data", from unclassified sources through special intelligence; to be more specific, many dozens of documents, from a large array of sources, were studied, verified and correlated before reaching a conclusion.  Unfortunately, the final clincher came from about a half-dozen sensitive documents which for security reasons will most probably never be released to the public in their entirety.

     10.  My and my counterparts' superiors immediately brushed aside each independent analytic conclusion, which previously had been collectively agreed upon orally by secure telephone.  Moreover, our superiors placed a word-of-mouth lid upon the normal written dissemination and sensitive backup documents were withdrawn from circulation.  STRIKE J2, AF BG Gibbons, assured me that the conclusion of the intelligence community would be released in good time following appropriate diplomatic negotiations.  I have no doubt that Gibbons' statement was made in good faith to me at the time, but was over-ruled by higher circles where "you-scratch-my-back-friendships", not integrity, are prime considerations.

     11.  Shortly after the end of the Six Day War, BG Gibbons directed me to assemble all the documents we (STRIKE) used as backup to support our Liberty incident conclusion and take them to the Pentagon to compare notes with DIA analysts and the U.S. Military Attache to Tel Aviv, Colonel Perna, who was returning to CONUS on leave.  It was upsetting for me to learn upon arrival that the sole purpose of the meeting was to provide an assembled package of back-up documents for Colonel Perna to read.  It was equally upsetting to learn that my package from STRIKE was considered much more complete than that supposedly prepared by DIA during the crisis and therefore selected as Perna's reading file; I, in turn, obviously was designated as defender of the conclusion.  When Perna finished reading, we (the analysts from DIA and I) asked his (as well as the US Embassy's) opinions on our conclusion.  He cut us short except to say that Israel needs our help.  To me, his retort was disgusting and immediately prompted me to wonder whether he would let our sensitive information "out-of-the-bag" to the Israelis.  (Though I have no facts to prove that he did, I was soon to learn that his feelings – "needs our help" – were shared by much of U.S. officialdom.)

     12.  I was pleased to hear that several governmental agencies decided to undertake hearings, but I wrote them off as a "whitewash" as soon as I learned that none of the senior intelligence analysts within the Washington, D.C., area had been called to appear for questioning; yet, their top bosses, the ones who had brushed aside the analytical opinions, were called because they possessed knowledge of "all the details".  Concurrently, all the information provided by the Israelis appears to have been accepted as fact without cross-examination under oath.  The final opinions expressed by the hurriedly assembled boards of inquiry (meeting behind closed doors) that they could find no evidence to suggest that the Israeli attack was anything but accidental, should be taken with a grain of salt until the boards show that they have the guts to explain in detail the rules under which the hearings were conducted.  As a minimum, the explanation should include: specific purpose; evidence to be admissible; specific rules for questioning (w/wo restrictions); rights to cross-examine evidence provided orally or written (w/wo restrictions); the selection process for persons to appear before the hearing.

     This personal synopsis is unclassified.  I am prepared to defend foregoing information (12 paragraphs; 8 pages) by cross-examination under oath, or even polygraph, provided that all those that made the decision to stop dissemination (see para 10) undergo the same.

                    (Signed)
                    RALPH R. HOPPE
                    LTC (retired)
                    U. S. Army

                    (Signed - Teresa Turley [?] - Sealed [date not legible])
                    NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF FLORIDA
                    MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: May 21, 1995
                    BONDED THRU NOTARY PUBLIC UNDERWRITERS


Current Address:

     8807 Byron Drive
     Tampa, Florida 33615

Tel #   813 886-8741

 

Hoppe63.jpg

 

Hoppe64.jpg

 

Hoppe65.jpg

 

Hoppe66.jpg

 

Hoppe67.jpg

 

Hoppe68.jpg

 

Hoppe69.jpg

 

Hoppe70.jpg

 

Hoppe71.jpg

 

 

Thank you for visiting my website.  Please come back soon! 
 
* * * * * * *
©  Stephen M. St. John 2007, 2017
 
All original articles written by Stephen M. St. John and published on this website and its forerunner mysite.verizon.net/vze4wbps are fully protected by copyright law.  All rights are reserved.  However, non-commercial dissemination of these articles is allowed and encouraged so long as there is no change to the text or its meaning and proper attribution is given to the author, Stephen M. St. John.  Requests for commercial republication should be directed to the author through the contact information given below.  The author is not responsible for any changes made to the contents of this website without his awareness and consent, and will as soon as possible restore the true content if and when such unauthorized changes are discovered.
 
Current (2017) contact information:
 
stephen@show-the-house.com
stephen.m.st.john@gmail.com
Please direct email to both email addresses
.
 
Cellphone:  408 934 6549
 
For regular mail via USPS, please send to
:
 
Stephen M. St. John
Post Office Box 720274
San José, CA   95172
United States of America
 
For FedEx and UPS shipments, please send to:
 
Stephen M. St. John
Colonnade # 720274
200 South 3rd Street
San José, CA 95112
USA
 

 
(The San José contact information shown above supercedes all previous contact information that may appear in this website including the mailing addresses Post Office Box 449, Rockefeller Center, New York, NY 10185; Post Office Box 1223, Newark, CA 94560; the email address metatron.metatron@verizon.net; and telephone numbers 212 534 5024 and 917 519 2905.  All postal forwarding orders have long been expired.)

* * * * * * *