Citizen of the USA Stephen M. St. John reports the dismissal of
his complaint against the United States Department of Justice et alii (10 CIV 3908) wherein he alleged that a bogus
9/11 “Dulles Airport” video surveillance tape was used in 2004 to promote the publisher’s release of the
false and misleading 9/11 Commission Report and in 2006 to convict Zacharias Moussaoui, and remains a major component
of the 9/11 Myth that was the catalyst for unjustified invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq.
Judge Loretta Preska abandoned the principal duty of a judge, which is to prevent force and fraud, when she ruled that Citizen
St. John lacked standing to sue because he did not demonstrate actual damage.
Her ex parte
decision denies Attorney General Eric Holder the opportunity to try to refute or otherwise confront facts and conclusions
which clearly point to premeditated and treasonous acts designed to establish a pretext for war in 2001.
in the New York City subway which urge heightened security awareness read, “If you see something, say something!”
This wisdom is the very essence of Citizen St. John’s court action. But what kind of jurisprudence
denies a watchman’s approach, let alone his warning?
In a very real sense all citizens who see something
and say something have standing and a natural right to a responsive government. Such citizens’ rights
and powers are protected by Amendments IX and X of the Constitution of the USA.
President Bush in
his 20 September 2001 speech before a joint session of the US Congress alluded to collective damages sustained by all citizens
of the USA when he said “Great harm has been done to us. We have suffered great loss. And in our grief and anger we
have found our mission and our moment. I will not forget the wound to our country and those who inflicted
What kind of jurisprudence hermetically seals one citizen out of many from the scope
of President Bush’s broad statement?
In his 29 January 2002 State of the Union speech President Bush observed:
“Those of us who have lived through these challenging times have been changed by them. We've come to know truths
that we will never question: Evil is real, and it must be opposed.”
the chain of custody of evidence for the fraudulent “Dulles Airport” video tape will help define the Praxis of
Evil which actually pulled off 9/11 and framed certain “likely suspect” Arabs for these heinous crimes.
what kind of jurisprudence prevents serious efforts to expose strong delusion and wrongdoing?
The words of the
prophet Hosea come to mind: “Thus judgment springeth up as hemlock in the furrows of the field.”
The rigidity of the law sustains a foreign policy built on a lie.
Therefore, now is the time for
an International Independent Investigation Commission to examine the attacks of 9/11, the cover-up and the “Shock &
To discover truth and to pursue justice and to expose and oppose the Praxis of Evil
which did 9/11 are now mankind’s collective duty and goal.
I CLAIMED A $50,000,000.00 AWARD
FOR HAVING EXPOSED A TREASONOUS ENEMY WITHIN THE USA BY FAX BROADCAST OF MY 4 DECEMBER 2009 LETTER TO THE CHIEF JUDGE OF THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. THIS FAX BROADCAST INCLUDED SENATORS SCHUMER AND
GILLIBRAND, REPRESENTATIVE MALONEY AND ALL THE MISSIONS TO THE UNITED NATIONS HERE IN NEW YORK CITY.
NOTICE OF CLAIM FOR HAVING EXPOSED THE 9/11 FRAME-UP AND COVER-UP
New York, New York * 4 December 2009 Citizen of the USA Stephen M. St. John
addresses the international community here in New York and has the honor to file in this fax broadcast a notice of claim before
the Chief Judge of the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, Loretta A. Preska, for a reward of $50,000,000
for his having uncovered the culprits behind the 9/11 frame-up and cover-up. Such an amount is commensurate with previous
offers of rewards for bringing in certain 9/11 suspects "dead or alive" and is a fair return for pointing to the
real purveyors of the shock and awe doctrine on 9/11, their false flag military intelligence operations and the full spectrum
fraud behind their full spectrum force.
Having been stonewalled by the Obama Administration, which is now staking
Afghanistan's future on derivatives of the BIG LIE of 9/11, Citizen St. John asks the court to examine in every detail his
article "Dulles Shadow casts Doubt on the US Government's 9/11 Conspiracy Theory" published on his website at http://www.show-the-house.com/id92.html.
Working with a purported Dulles Airport video surveillance tape of five Arab hijackers on the morning of 9/11,
which was admitted as evidence by Judge Leonie Brinkema at the trial of Zacharias Moussaoui, analysis of the sun's shadow
cast by a passerby outside the terminal door led to the conclusion that the film is bogus; i.e., that the video was made elsewhere
and then fraudulently presented as evidence at the US Courthouse, Eastern District of Virginia, and also on TV to promote
the release of the 9/11 Commission Report.
Introduction of fraudulent evidence in the form of a bogus airport surveillance
video could not possibly have been accidental, and somewhere along the chain of possession of evidence a link to the praxis
of evil will be found.
With regard to the forthcoming trial of "confessed" 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh
Mohammed, it behooves this court to prevent more Texas justice with Virginia lawyers, to confront the fraud with respect to
the purported Dulles Airport video, and to call for a new and real investigation of 9/11 rather than another show trial of
a psychologically impaired pawn.
Dulles Airport Shadow casts Doubt on US Government's 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Stephen M. St. John
Post Office Box 449
New York, New York 10185
Tel/Fax: 212 534 5024
THE SILENCE WAS DEAFENING, SO
I TRIED AGAIN WITH A HANDWRITTEN LETTER TO JUDGE PRESKA DATED 31 DECEMBER 2009. THE TEXT APPEARS BELOW.
Stephen M. St. John
Post Office Box 449
New York, NY 10185
United States District Court, SDNY
500 Pearl Street,
New York, New York 10007-1312
31 December 2009
Dear Judge Preska,
hereby renew and reiterate my claim of an award for having exposed the frame-up and cover-up of 9/11, which claim I made in
a fax broadcast to you and the missions to the United Nations here in New York City on 4 December 2009.
a federal judge you are obligated to prevent fraud and force, and you can refer to my fax broadcast now published on my website
at http://www.show-the-house.com/id8.html where you scroll to 4 December.
My boss, Marian Britton, who was the Assistant New
York Regional Director of the Census Bureau at 26 Federal Plaza, was on United Airlines flight 93 on 9/11, and my misgivings
about the official story of 9/11 began with the realization that airport surveillance videos of her or of any of the other
passengers or hijackers were not made available to anyone under any circumstances.
Bureau colleague witnessed and described to me the bizarre approach of United flight 175 over New York harbor, which I later
discovered could not have been accomplished even by a top gun pilot, and therefore could only have been done by remote control.
I'm showing you that a purported Dulles Airport video surveillance tape, used as evidence by the US Government, is as phony
as Osama Bin Laden's videotaped messages to the world. Please see http://www.show-the-house.com/id92.html.
Please do not join the conspiracy of silence! I'd very much like to meet with you
to discuss what can and should be done.
Very truly yours,
Stephen M. St. John
UPDATE (26 March 2010):
came a couple of weeks later. As shown below, my 31 December 2009 letter to Judge Preska was stamped "received"
on 5 January 2010 and then sent back to me along with a general instruction packet dated 15 January 2010 from the Pro Se Clerk
J. Michael McMahon.
I therefore followed through and filed a pro se et qui tam complaint as follows:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
STEPHEN M. ST. JOHN,
pro se et qui tam
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE;
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES,
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK,
JOHN AND JANE DOES ACTING AS PERPETRATORS,
ACCOMPLICES AND ACCESSORIES TO THE ACTS DESCRIBED
IN THIS COMPLAINT.
I PARTIES IN THIS COMPLAINT:
Stephen M. St. John
New York, NY 10128
(Fax Number withheld)
States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20530
2) Attorney General of the United States, Eric
950 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20530
202 514 2000
3) United States Attorney, Southern District of New York, Preet Bharara
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
York, NY 10007
212 637 2200,
Fax 212 637 2390
Alii, John and Jane Does who are perpetrators, accomplices and accessories to the acts described in this complaint
and whose identities and whereabouts are unknown to the plaintiff at the time of making this complaint.
BASIS FOR JURISDICTION:
The basis for federal court jurisdiction consists of statutory
prohibitions against fraud and conspiracy to perpetrate a fraud, and Article III, Section iii, of the Constitution of the United States.
III STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
did the events giving rise to your claim(s) occur?
New York, New York; Washington, DC; Alexandria,
VA; Boston, MA; Newark, NJ; Herndon, VA.
B) What date and approximate time did the events giving rise
to your claim(s) occur?
11 September 2001; 21 July 2004; ? June 2006; ? November 2009.
The US Department of Justice framed Zacharias Moussaoui at his 2006
trial with Exhibit NT00211, a bogus "Dulles Airport" video surveillance tape. My original photo analysis in
July 2009 uncovered the fraud with the aid of Google Earth and basic astronomy and geometry as evinced by the sun's shadow
cast by passers-by in the far background of the film. See http://www.show-the-house.com/id92.html. Logic dictates this video had been filmed elsewhere, and then falsely presented as having been filmed at Dulles on
the morning of 11 September 2001. Earlier, on 21 July 2004, a major TV network broadcast a variant form of this purported
"Dulles Airport" video to promote the release of the shoddy 9/11 Commission Report
the very next day. This deception – not a ruse de guerre against an enemy,
but a ruse à commencer une guerre against the people – indicates a conspiracy
to commit fraud on the people of the USA and the world, and circumstances indicate this fraud was perpetrated with foreknowledge
of the attacks on 9/11, and therefore was an act of treason. Now President Obama has ordered the slam-dunk show trial
of "confessed" 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and in carrying out the President's order, the defendants
will only perpetuate this major fraud that led to the destruction of Afghanistan and Iraq, and remains a major component of
the 9/11 myth.
I am deeply, deeply offended and alienated
by the USG's Big Lie about 9/11, and the vile persons who would craft a false flag black military intelligence operation to
create a pretext for undeclared war when no real reason to justify war existed or exists. I am deeply aggrieved because
I cannot support my government when it cannot confront an enemy within, a praxis of evil whose purpose is to wage aggressive
war in violation of the letter and spirit of international law, particularly the Nuremberg Principles.
I petition this Court to:
Issue an injunction stopping the defendants'
current plan to prosecute Khalid Sheikh Mohammed here in New York or anywhere else;
Order the defendants to move
to grant Zacharias Moussaoui a new trial;
Order the defendants to convene a Grand Jury to weigh and consider the
bogus "Dulles Airport" surveillance video, and other evidence which will be forthcoming, with a view toward the
identification, indictment, trial, judgment and punishment of the perpetrators according to the law;
defendants to undertake a new and real investigation of 9/11, which will act in conjunction with the Grand Jury mentioned
above, and will include consideration of the shock and awe doctrine, the cover-up, and many important discoveries and insights
of independent researchers;
Order the defendants to award the plaintiff the sum of $50,000,000.00 for his discovery
of a conspiracy to commit fraud in the furtherance of treasonous acts perpetrated by an enemy within, a praxis of evil whose
purpose is to wage aggressive war in violation of the letter and spirit of international law, particularly the Nuremberg Principles;
Grant leave to the plaintiff to file an amended, fuller complaint at a later date when personal, technical difficulties
are overcome. This will be an MS Word document.
Signed this 31st day of January, 2010.
of Plaintiff: Stephen M. St. John
New York, NY 10128
Telephone Number: (withheld)